The Medium is the Message
![]() |
“The medium is the message” is a quote I often
heard during my undergrad at Western University where I studied Media Information Technoculture, and
developed a personal passion for critically thinking about the media. Marshall
McLuhan was a Canadian professor, philosopher, and public intellectual. He is
generally associated with his prediction of the Internet, thirty-five years
before it happened. However, what I associate with McLuhan is his theories on
media and their affect on society. Though most of his career was spent
deconstructing the media, we as media literate citizens can deconstruct his
saying “the medium is the message”, to determine the meaning behind it. The
“medium” refers to mass-media communications such as television, internet,
radio, etc. The “message” refers to the content or information that is
transmitted. What McLuhan theorized was that the form of the message determines
the ways in which the message will be perceived. Modern communications actually
alter the way we experience the world due to their sociological, political,
cultural, and economical influence on society. McLuhan was transitioning the
dialogue away from the technology itself, but instead focusing on the
implications of that technology.
This has powerful repercussions for
society. Due to the overwhelming influence the media has on our lives, shaping
our experience, it is imperative that as teachers we provide students with the
opportunities, skills, and critical mindset, to decipher, deconstruct, and
question the content the media is constantly communicating to us. In “The
Ontario Curriculum” for grades 1-8 for Language Arts, there is an entire
section devoted to “Media Literacy”. Media literacy taught in schools should
explore the influence or control mass media has on society through the
examination of multiple medium platforms (e.g. films, songs, advertisements,
television shows, magazines, news, social media, and websites). These mediums
have significant influence on students’ lives and thus it is imperative that
students develop their critical thinking skills as they apply to media products
and media messages. The curriculum states, “understanding how media texts are
constructed and why they are produced enables students to respond to them
intelligently and responsibly” (13). As teachers we need to educate students
how to critically interpret the messages perpetuated by the media, as well as
communicate their own ideas through the media.
Now that we recognize that the “medium is the
message” and understand the curriculum requirements for media literacy, we can
look at two articles that highlight the relevance of media literacy within the
classroom context. Education World has a blog called “Easy Ways to Integrate Media Literacy in the Classroom”. The main focus of the blog is the essential
need for students to develop a deeper understanding of the media’s influence on
our behaviours and thinking. It highlights how the younger generation may
understand how to use technologies but are not literate when it comes to
finding the meaning integrated into the content communicated. The blog provides
teachers with topics that should be taught to and discussed amongst students.
This includes the deconstruction of advertisements, critiquing representations
and portrayals, and overall critically analyzing the messages perpetuated by
the media. The article suggests asking questions such as: “How do impossible
ideals influence how students perceive their own appearance and success? How do
shows stereotype certain people? What groups are marginalized or entirely
absent?” (Education World).
“Fake News Lesson Plan Ideas”, a blog written by Vicki Davis interviewing Jennifer Carey, is a more specified
version of the Education World blog.
Carey indicates the need to take precautions when referencing the media as
resources of information because of how easy it is to receive false, altered,
or biased material. Carey, similarly to Education
World, states Students should learn to deconstruct, criticize, and question
the media, but she relates it specifically to news sources. Written in the blog
are examples of activities teachers can do with their students to educate them
on realizing when information is true or false. An activity she proposes is
having students create three fake news stories and two real news stories and
trying to trick their peers into believing the fake stories. By positioning the
students on the side of deceiver, they can learn how easy it is to bias
stories, and those on the end of receiver can develop tools to deconstruct news
in order to measure the truthfulness of the story.
Reading these articles has impacted my teaching
practice and inspired me to teach media literacy in a way that resonates with
students and relates to their everyday life inside and outside of the
classroom. An activity that I would propose doing would be looking at two
different styles of news outlets. There are great applications that students
can utilize to stay current with world news, access resources for retrieving
information, and constantly develop their repertoire of knowledge. However, it
is important that students decipher between trustworthy news sources and those
that are biased. The trustworthy news sources take on the “Public Sphere
Model”, which treats people like citizens who deserve access to accurate
information, provides those citizens with necessary resources and information
they need in order to participate in a democratic society, and promotes
diversity. The news sources that are biased take on the “Market Model”, which
are undemocratic, focusing on light entertainment and scandals,
sensationalized, concerned with market success, produce inequality, and overall
treat people as consumers; only motivated to sell products and information
preferred by the dominant class. The activity I plan to integrate into the
classroom is comparing the Al Jazeera
mobile application (public sphere model) and Fox News mobile application (market model). I would have the
students browse both applications comparing the headlines, content of the news,
viewpoints of the content, represented and underrepresented groups, what groups
are portrayed as negative or positive, and more. For example, I have included below
two screen grabs from each news application below.
Fox News runs pieces without news value and instead provides propaganda, conservative ideals, and ultimately undermines democracy. As you can see, the included resources negatively portray immigration. They also showcase violence against the police rather than the overwhelming presence of police brutality on marginalized groups in today’s society. Additionally, Fox focuses on scandals such as a teacher having sex with students, instead of relevant and critical world issues.
Fox News runs pieces without news value and instead provides propaganda, conservative ideals, and ultimately undermines democracy. As you can see, the included resources negatively portray immigration. They also showcase violence against the police rather than the overwhelming presence of police brutality on marginalized groups in today’s society. Additionally, Fox focuses on scandals such as a teacher having sex with students, instead of relevant and critical world issues.
Al Jazeera is not profit-driven, avoids sensationalism, and serves the public interest. They provide news stories about the torture of Palestinians in PA prisons, realistically show the victimization of this marginalized group rather than stereotyping them as terrorists. They focus on domestic violence and homelessness, disseminating the view points of the oppressed that are generally overshadowed by the dominant classes. Al Jazeera also took the initiative to begin a project helping refugees in Bangladesh. This news source shows all viewpoints of events, and provides stories that are necessary for viewers to know based on being informed citizens. This activity will teach students how to analyze news stories, and determine the best tools for them to utilize to access resources and information.
Now that we have discussed and distressed the importance of educating students on media literacy, I want to leave you with a short but sweet Ted Talk by Andrea Quijada called “Creating Critical Thinkers through Media Literacy.” Quijada reiterates what I have outlined above, regarding students’ ability analyze media in a critical way by questioning, evaluating, and understanding their multimedia culture. We as educators need to cultivate active, engaged, media users, and I believe Quijada eloquently and fiercely communicates this need.





Comments
Post a Comment